Nissan's SR20 VVL Neo vs Toyota's 20v
Select messages from
# through # FAQ
[/[Print]\]
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  :| |:
trinituner.com -> TECH STUFF

#61:  Author: adriano7910 PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 10:45 pm
    —
Supra GT-FOUR wrote:
i really dont see the point in comparing a 1.6l 20 valve and a 2.0l sr20 vvl. efficiency is about hp per litre.
A more sutiable comparison would be the sr16-ve and the 20valve both having 1.6l displacement.
also what version of 20valve balcktop or silvertop?

bess we throw a b16a or b into this 1.6 mix too just saying Twisted Evil

#62:  Author: boogeLocation: World PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 8:05 am
    —
lol

#63:  Author: Supra GT-FOURLocation: STFU PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 10:54 am
    —
[quote="adriano7910]
bess we throw a b16a or b into this 1.6 mix too just saying Twisted Evil[/quote]
We dont discriminate pally competition breeds innovation... thats one of the reasons why ppl like lamborghini etc. started building cars



trinituner.com -> TECH STUFF


output generated using printer-friendly topic mod. All times are GMT - 4 Hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  :| |:
Page 4 of 4

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group