trinituner.com :: View topic - D3305Ti Selenium vs RCF N850

through

[^/[Print]\]
Goto page 1, 2 Next :| |:
trinituner.com -> I.C.E.

#1: D3305Ti Selenium vs RCF N850 Author: nirmal_333,

Posted: Sun May 24, 2009 10:07 am
—
i don't have much experience with these but which plays louder and cleaner ? yes i have a loud bass line and
MY MIDS ARE
2 6" 18SOUND
2 8" 18SOUND

AND WAS WONDERING which one would be better on the system

#2: Author: southside connections,

Posted: Sun May 24, 2009 10:14 am
—
no comparison here, you are compairing one company's highest line of ferrite driver(rcf) to the midline of another(selinium)

the rcf has by far a better tonal flat respone

#3: Author: 3stagevtec, Location: killing two stones with one bird...

Posted: Sun May 24, 2009 5:27 pm
—

southside connections wrote:

no comparison here, you are compairing one company's highest line of ferrite driver(rcf) to the midline of another(selinium)

the rcf has by far a better tonal flat respone

i can agree about the flat freq response.. but tonal accuracy is a different thing..

i doubt there are any tonally accurate compression drivers..

#4: Author: silent_riot, Location: Gone digital

Posted: Sun May 24, 2009 6:16 pm
—

3stagevtec wrote:

i doubt there are any tonally accurate compression drivers..

Don't forget about older lines of comp drivers from image dynamics, usd, crystal etc who made comp drivers specifically for sound quality reproduction. Wink

#5: Author: southside connections,

Posted: Sun May 24, 2009 8:11 pm
—
yip^^^^^

#6: Author: 3stagevtec, Location: killing two stones with one bird...

Posted: Sun May 24, 2009 8:17 pm
—
^ Surprised

learn something new..

this might be a dumb question, but are any of the modern comp drivers SQ oriented, or kinda close to SQ oriented? (i'm not talking about a flat response, but more tonal accuracy..)

#7: Author: silent_riot, Location: Gone digital

Posted: Sun May 24, 2009 8:34 pm
—
Well I know image dynamics still makes them, they are expensive tho.
Balls was bringing out a sound Q car with horns, but I never saw that materialized.
Comp drivers from what I read require good processing, so that needs to be considered as well. The lifelike dynamics of those comp drivers cannot be beaten!

#8: Author: 3stagevtec, Location: killing two stones with one bird...

Posted: Sun May 24, 2009 8:37 pm
—
interesting..

http://www.imagedynamicsusa.com/products.php?Family_Id=5

#9: Author: b12nismo,

Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 2:05 pm
—
silent_riot, care to elaborate more on good processing ? i.e. what you think someone should use ?

i considering using drivers my self but i'm using a prs 880 right now

#10: Author: 3stagevtec, Location: killing two stones with one bird...

Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 2:15 pm
—
good processing is all about setting your crossovers and EQ to match your speakers / response..

#11: Author: nirmal_333,

Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 2:53 pm
—
silent_riot, you know any one use the image dynamics ?

#12: Author: silent_riot, Location: Gone digital

Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 3:36 pm
—
pm gfbl, he recently sold his pair to someone.

#13: Author: (...Rovin...), Location: Chaguanas

Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 3:46 pm
—
never liked any selenium drivers except d 220 TI ... rest of them dont sound "full" imo ...u get it all from d N850

1 way of picking a driver without hearing it is to look at its freq response graph ....

#14: Author: nirmal_333,

Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 4:01 pm
—
(...Rovin...), where can i find that ?

whats you'll view based on choosing a flare ? i found that that image dynamics falre is very nice but would does the flare make it sound different

this is in my comparision to the selenium driver the short one i don't have a pic to show as compared to the image dynamics one which can be found here
http://www.imagedynamicsusa.com/products.php?Family_Id=5

#15: Author: southside connections,

Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 6:21 pm
—
horn to unit matching is the most important physical alignment

after that,it all up to processing and x-over

you can make the 405 or the 3305 drivers sound pretty good given your system is well planned and very accuratly tuned

#16: Author: (...Rovin...), Location: Chaguanas

Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 6:40 pm
—
http://www.rcf.it/c/documen...acf3bebda67&groupId=10617

http://www.seleniumloudspea...tanium_D3305tidpd_new.pdf

however , in spite of all d specs it depends of what u like when u hear each in real

each driver from each company has a flare they made especially for it ...

#17: Author: xeon, Location: Toco Lighthouse

Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 7:55 pm
—

(...Rovin...) wrote:

never liked any selenium drivers except d 220 TI ... rest of them dont sound "full" imo ...u get it all from d N850

1 way of picking a driver without hearing it is to look at its freq response graph ....

yesssss daz ah bess driver, 4got to mention the D210Ti

#18: Author: Pre, Location: South

Posted: Tue May 26, 2009 4:34 pm
—
i had/have both the 3305 and the N850 drivers bt none in cars the N850 is by the better of the 2 no contest but then u have to look at the price difference

#19: Author: markzz, Location: Somewhere in the East..

Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:54 am
—
anyone here noticed the selenium d2500Ti and the Image Dynamics HLCD are the same exact driver? Shocked

specs slightly different.. hmm i wonder if Selenium made the Image Dynamics drivers... Laughing

take a look guys.. i own a pair of the Selenium d2500Ti hence why i noticed take a look...

http://www.parts-express.co...umber=264-275&ctab=2#Tabs

http://www.woofersetc.com/p...n-HLCD-Speaker-System.htm

http://www.imagedynamicsusa.com/products.php?Family_Id=5&Product_Id=23

#20: Author: xeon, Location: Toco Lighthouse

Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2009 7:21 am
—

markzz wrote:

anyone here noticed the selenium d2500Ti and the Image Dynamics HLCD are the same exact driver? Shocked

specs slightly different.. hmm i wonder if Selenium made the Image Dynamics drivers... Laughing

wow like they outsource them, it looks d same way Shocked

trinituner.com -> I.C.E.

output generated using printer-friendly topic mod. All times are GMT - 4 Hours

Goto page 1, 2 Next :| |: Page 1 of 2