| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author
|
Message |
legacy_specB Sweet on this forum
Joined: 11 Mar 2009 Tech posts: 260 Location: South My 2NRide: Subaru Legacy Spec. B
|
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 7:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| RB25-DET wrote: | | legacy_specB wrote: | RB25-DET....................change yuh signature nah...............  |
alyuh hada excuse meh eh, i was born in a B11 please dont take offence to the signature i know i'm in a subaru forum.....  |
No offense taken i just giving yuh some static..  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
b18b_turbo Riding on 16's
Joined: 01 Apr 2007 Tech posts: 1180 Location: teaching the jack@$$ My 2NRide: Datsun 120Y
|
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 7:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| legacy_specB wrote: | Ok so with that TMIC the surface area changes.....it is increased. So the result would be cooler charged air. Now what about flow characteristics?? Does the manufacturer say how much the pressure drop is with this TMIC?
The piping also greatly affects the pressure drop through the FMIC that also needs to be taken into consideration. If you notice with the piping setup of ole whore's FMIC, The piping from the turbo to the IC is smaller than the piping to the throttle body. Why do you think that is?? That would actually affect the amount of lag produced.
Depending on the piping you use, the FMIC would still flow greater amounts of colder air than the TMIC with slightly more lag.
I am not disputing the lag.
Consider this: TMIC flowing cold air but quickly reaches max flow capacity. FMIC flowing air of the same temperature, but does not reach max flow capacity as fast with a 1 psi drop in pressure. The top end flow would be much better. Which one you think works out better even with the pressure drop? |
- pressure drop with TMIC = 0
- The pipe diameter is reduced to increase flow rate under a specific pressure in an effort to reduce lag. Did you know that increasing and decreasing the diameter of a pipe along a path of flow of a fluid at high velocity, creates turbulent flow? Laminar flow is what is desired, which is why constant diameter is preferred. Momentum is also affected as mass of air per unit volume suddenly changes. (I did this stuff in school ).
Where did you get the term "max flow capacity?" An intercooler is like a box-shaped pipe with little radiators all over the insides....there is nothing like a max flow capacity David...unless you running like 35psi or something  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
legacy_specB Sweet on this forum
Joined: 11 Mar 2009 Tech posts: 260 Location: South My 2NRide: Subaru Legacy Spec. B
|
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 7:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ok how about max effecient flow capacity? That better?
And don't call meh fackin name on the forum nah boi.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
b18b_turbo Riding on 16's
Joined: 01 Apr 2007 Tech posts: 1180 Location: teaching the jack@$$ My 2NRide: Datsun 120Y
|
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 7:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| legacy_specB wrote: | Ok how about max effecient flow capacity? That better?
And don't call meh fackin name on the forum nah boi.  |
which is why i said:
"unless you running 35 psi or something" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
legacy_specB Sweet on this forum
Joined: 11 Mar 2009 Tech posts: 260 Location: South My 2NRide: Subaru Legacy Spec. B
|
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 7:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Max efficient flow would come into play waaaay before then. At 22 psi I would not even think about running a TMIC. At that boost level a FMIC would handle it much better. And b18 there is a pressure drop still. And it's about half a psi. Do your research on reviews of ppl who have actually used this TMIC.
If you want to tell me that at 14.5-18 psi on the stock turbo, the TMIC is better, then I would quicker agree with that.
Last edited by legacy_specB on Sun Oct 25, 2009 7:49 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Flex030 3NE2NR is my LIFE
Joined: 25 May 2008 Tech posts: 808
My 2NRide:
|
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 7:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm sure Redman would be proud he asked that question, i am...  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
b18b_turbo Riding on 16's
Joined: 01 Apr 2007 Tech posts: 1180 Location: teaching the jack@$$ My 2NRide: Datsun 120Y
|
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 7:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Legacy_SpecB, we talkin about redman car....not ken block!
PS: do you have PSI vs RPM vs Radiation curves to support ur claim?...you sound like u do...

Last edited by b18b_turbo on Sun Oct 25, 2009 7:47 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bacon Chronic TriniTuner
Joined: 17 Nov 2008 Tech posts: 657 Location: Vancouver BC My 2NRide:
|
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 7:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The saga continues
I decided to leave the entire statements with only the names edited...........
| ** wrote: | I saw one of those Perrin TMIC on a legacy wagon a few days ago. Very soild piece of hardware. The turbo bolted directly onto it, does yours do the same? I don't understand what people said "couldn't be done"? Looks good so far.
Is that Perrin Recirc valve a proper recirculation valve or a BOV? |
| * wrote: | | **, it is a direct bolt up, full re-circulation valve..... brought it in myself |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
legacy_specB Sweet on this forum
Joined: 11 Mar 2009 Tech posts: 260 Location: South My 2NRide: Subaru Legacy Spec. B
|
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 7:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| But since is redman car we talking bout here and he may never cross 20psi then maybe the TMIC would be sufficient. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
b18b_turbo Riding on 16's
Joined: 01 Apr 2007 Tech posts: 1180 Location: teaching the jack@$$ My 2NRide: Datsun 120Y
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
legacy_specB Sweet on this forum
Joined: 11 Mar 2009 Tech posts: 260 Location: South My 2NRide: Subaru Legacy Spec. B
|
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 7:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
But I just say that since is redman car we talking bout it would work!!!!!! B18b read boy read!!!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Flex030 3NE2NR is my LIFE
Joined: 25 May 2008 Tech posts: 808
My 2NRide:
|
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 7:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| TMIC OR FMIC both has it’s advantages and disadvantages just doh forget the water/meth very useful addition to the mix. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bacon Chronic TriniTuner
Joined: 17 Nov 2008 Tech posts: 657 Location: Vancouver BC My 2NRide:
|
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 7:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
But somehow.......all kicks aside....the rate that RM fella start out hot and sweaty I would not be surprised if he does..........
Last edited by Bacon on Sun Oct 25, 2009 7:53 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
b18b_turbo Riding on 16's
Joined: 01 Apr 2007 Tech posts: 1180 Location: teaching the jack@$$ My 2NRide: Datsun 120Y
|
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 7:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| legacy_specB wrote: | But I just say that since is redman car we talking bout it would work!!!!!! B18b read boy read!!!  |
which is why i say u underestimate the power of a TMIC, which is why i posted the vid that i did.
This goes to show about our rising heat theory and also BIG turbo on TMIC lag, they mentioned it in teh vid. However in the following vid, BIg turbo + FMIC had RIDUCULOUS LAG:
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
legacy_specB Sweet on this forum
Joined: 11 Mar 2009 Tech posts: 260 Location: South My 2NRide: Subaru Legacy Spec. B
|
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 8:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| That's right Flex. WMI is important. And much more so when running a TMIC. Also b18b did you notice the thing in the trunk of the car???? I wonder if that car would be doing so much hp if that wasn't there? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
legacy_specB Sweet on this forum
Joined: 11 Mar 2009 Tech posts: 260 Location: South My 2NRide: Subaru Legacy Spec. B
|
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 8:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Where redman? Redo I have ah question for you. What exactly you plan on doing with yuh car? In terms of boost levels etc? It makes no sense arguing which is better for you if we don't know how you plan to use it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
b18b_turbo Riding on 16's
Joined: 01 Apr 2007 Tech posts: 1180 Location: teaching the jack@$$ My 2NRide: Datsun 120Y
|
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 8:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| legacy_specB wrote: | | It makes no sense arguing |
man speak for himself  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
legacy_specB Sweet on this forum
Joined: 11 Mar 2009 Tech posts: 260 Location: South My 2NRide: Subaru Legacy Spec. B
|
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 9:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| B18 btw the lag in that video have nothing to do with the FMIC. Like the guy said it is because of the massive turbo used and the gear that he was in. You would get that same lag with a TMIC. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
b18b_turbo Riding on 16's
Joined: 01 Apr 2007 Tech posts: 1180 Location: teaching the jack@$$ My 2NRide: Datsun 120Y
|
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 9:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
lag depends on what gear you are in sir....
both cars huge single scroll turbos, similar output, one with tmic, one with fmic.
they were also both in 4th gear eh.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Redman 3NE 2NR for life
Joined: 19 Aug 2004 Tech posts: 160
My 2NRide:
|
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 8:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Um I think I will just stay stock
Thanks
Ok
Thanks for all the info-and I appreciate flex's pride Im a man that just found the jack handle. I fully agree with his point of the comfort of ride and keepin that as the priority (if it is in fact the priority)
My issue would be what s the cost of a top mount installed vs the FMIC installed, and then look at the inc in performance per $ spent.(cant help it its my nature) The cost benefit is the first step.
Im not looking to be the fastest-I this is the last mod I would be making for a while and to be frank the ease of the TMIC switch is attractive.
With the top mount I understand that the Perrins require a little mods while you can order the AVO as a JDM spec and is a seamless mount up with a possible issue with the seal under the bonnet.
WHats the gain in HP with the 2 and approx cost?
Would I need to change the size of the turbo to get the benefits out of a FMIC??
Later |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|