| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author
|
Message |
zodiaque CARS Member
Joined: 18 Apr 2003 Tech posts: 2000 Location: The thin line between brave and insane My 2NRide: Mitsubishi Lancer
|
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 1:06 pm Post subject: GS and HS in wrong order? |
|
|
I was looking through the SCCA classifications. I know that we don't adhere to the same rules all the way, but it seems to me that in Solodex we have HS and GS classes mixed up. In other words, all cars in HS should be in GS and Vice-versa. I could be totally wrong, I'm not sure. Can anyone verify?
http://moutons.org/sccasolo/Lists/2006/stockc.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
MG Man 2NRholic
Joined: 01 May 2003 Tech posts: 2682 Location: Sitting on a cornflake My 2NRide: Vauxhall Chevette
|
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 1:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| as long as the cars themselves are grouped together properly, the name should not be an issue |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rudman Riding on 17's
Joined: 17 Aug 2005 Tech posts: 1297 Location: Maintaining the status quo My 2NRide:
|
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 4:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
^Agreed. BTW, what does HS stand for?
Ah figure GS is Geriatric Street class........  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zodiaque CARS Member
Joined: 18 Apr 2003 Tech posts: 2000 Location: The thin line between brave and insane My 2NRide: Mitsubishi Lancer
|
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 6:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ^*Throws differential at Rudman* |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zodiaque CARS Member
Joined: 18 Apr 2003 Tech posts: 2000 Location: The thin line between brave and insane My 2NRide: Mitsubishi Lancer
|
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 6:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| MG Man wrote: | | as long as the cars themselves are grouped together properly, the name should not be an issue |
That is true, |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|