Please download the latest Flash Player here

Homepage send us an email homepage Buckle Up -Racers against Street Racing
See homepage for most recent events Featured Rides Our Reader's Rides - submit your own! FREE classifieds! Car Audio garage auto tuning tips Automotive links
T&T's Largest Automotive Website: 8000+ visitors a day; 15,000+ registered members; HUGE classifieds
 
Want to get your ad here? Click for details...

 Garage2NRides  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in 


DO K&N AIR FILTERS really give u more HP
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
View unanswered posts
Post new topic   Reply to topic   printer-friendly view    trinituner.com Forum Index -> TECH STUFF
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
nismown3d
Sweet on this forum


Joined: 04 Sep 2007
Tech posts: 347

My 2NRide: Toyota Aristo V

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 11:21 am
   Post subject:
Reply with quote

I've seen n/a cars actually lose HP as well with intake systems. Usually you want to stick to higher end intake systems that are properly tuned like HKS, Greddy, Apexi, etc. I'm not a big fan of K&N filters, any filter you need to clean will always be more restrictive after you clean it than when it was brand new. The HKS filters are the best, it has a velocity stack in the mushroom assembly, and you just replace the whole filter element instead of cleaning it.


Usually any car with forced induction you'll see the biggest hp gains.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
thegtiman
TriniTuner Crew


Joined: 17 Jun 2005
Tech posts: 419
Location: In front and getting smaller...
My 2NRide:

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 5:27 pm
   Post subject:
Reply with quote

nismown3d wrote:
I've seen n/a cars actually lose HP as well with intake systems. Usually you want to stick to higher end intake systems that are properly tuned like HKS, Greddy, Apexi, etc. I'm not a big fan of K&N filters, any filter you need to clean will always be more restrictive after you clean it than when it was brand new. The HKS filters are the best, it has a velocity stack in the mushroom assembly, and you just replace the whole filter element instead of cleaning it.


Usually any car with forced induction you'll see the biggest hp gains.


In that test, from my previous post, the modified airbox was run with and without an air filter and the results were the same.
The Pipercross pod filter kit has a velocity stack built in similar to an HKS item. This was run in an ideal situation i.e. dyno fan blowing on filter. In real life with its metal frame the engine bay heat will soak in, get transfered to the air charge and work as bad as the open throttle body. Nothing was able to out perform good ol home engineering on that day.
My turbo cars run modified standard airboxes with panel filters. The Airbox is also tuned to make the right noises.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
red bwoy
I LUV THIS PLACE


Joined: 02 Mar 2007
Tech posts: 932
Location: rite now ah fawkin lorse ah loooorse
My 2NRide: Mazda 323

PostPosted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 10:11 pm
   Post subject:
Reply with quote

i think a lot of ppl missed one important fact in most tests by companies with panel or free flow filters most vehicles actually loose HP at low revs but gain appreciably at high rpm's i can attest to this my familia has an engine rated at 130 bhp i've never dynoed but with my oe filter i never crossed 175kms on the k&n panel filter i cross 175 with ease and actually feel a better pull at higher rpms with the K&N
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
W2J
3NE 2NR Power Seller


Joined: 17 Apr 2003
Tech posts: 2109
Location: Trinidad
My 2NRide:

PostPosted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 11:14 pm
   Post subject:
Reply with quote

A engine is a pump the more air you get in and the faster you get it out the more power you will make of course once you have the supporting mods. But we are not talking about adjusting fuel and ignition curves, my belief and experience being on the dyno and off you do make more power by adding a KN drop in over the conventional paper element, if you wish to see I have a simple machine supplied by KN which can be calibrated to show the differences, you are all free to come and see.

Gerrard
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
rjaggs
Sweet on this forum


Joined: 30 Oct 2007
Tech posts: 343

My 2NRide: Mitsubishi Mivec

PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 10:00 am
   Post subject:
Reply with quote

i bought my car with the stock intake and paper filter, eventually i installed a short ram intake which i used for about a year and a half. I recently reinstalled the stock intake with a K&N drop in, and the three scenarios yielded noticeably different results. Obviously the worst option was the paper filter, even when it was new it couldn't compare to the K&N drop in. The SRI gave better top end performance especially when vvt engages. The drop in resulted in better low down performance but lost out at higher rpms.

All in all i am pretty satisfied with the k&n drop in for the 'colder air' pulling from the front of the car as opposed to the short ram.......that is until i decide to install a CAI.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   printer-friendly view    trinituner.com Forum Index -> TECH STUFF All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
ScriptWiz.com phpbb HTML Archiver - Created by ScriptWiz.com and released by Skinz.org